cupe-campaigns.gif

News

Public sewage treatment could be over $100 million cheaper

Mar 19, 2010

VICTORIA - A new report by B.C.’s most respected forensic accountant, Ron Parks, finds in favour of public operation of sewage treatment in the Capital more...

Voices for public sewage treatment in Victoria

Mar 16, 2010

VICTORIA—At meetings on February 25 and March 10, the house was full as Capital Regional District residents shared their views on sewage treatment procurement. more...

The community comes out for public sewage in Victoria

Mar 11, 2010

VICTORIA-The house was full at the second public meeting for citizens in the Capital Regional District to share their views on sewage treatment procurement. more...

CRD vulnerable to trade restrictions with sewage P3

Mar 09, 2010

BURNABY—If local governments opt for public private partnerships (P3s), something which is under consideration for the Capital Regional District’s more...

Click here for the archive

 

Water Watch

Communities throughout B.C. and across Canada are facing pressure to privatize their water systems.

Water Watch raises awareness about the risks of privatizing water and encourages maintaining public water systems.

Capital Regional District Public Sewage Treatment Campaign

Say NO to private sewage treatment for Greater Victoria. Sign the petition!  For more information on this campaign, please click here.

CUPE works closely with community organizations and the Council of Canadians to protect water and wastewater systems from privatization. 

If you would like to help protect public water, contact the Water Watch Coordinator.

 

Latest Story

March 19, 2010

Public sewage treatment could be over $100 million cheaper

VICTORIA - A new report by B.C.’s most respected forensic accountant, Ron Parks, finds in favour of public operation of sewage treatment in the Capital Regional District (CRD). Parks’ review of the business case in support of provincial funding for sewage treatment finds that the assumed cost of public operation is inflated in a number of ways, including double-counting risk, unjustified assumption of higher public costs, and using a discount rate that is too high. The business case uses an assumed ...

Read More