cupe-campaigns.gif

News

CUPE 50 raises contracting-out concerns

Sep 03, 2010

VICTORIA—CUPE 50 president John Burrows called on Victoria’s Mayor and Council to fully consider the public option in solid waste collection and management. more...

CUPE BC urges Metro to adopt more recycling, waste reduction

Jul 16, 2010

Union submission opposes privatized incineration option for Lower Mainland VANCOUVER—CUPE BC’s submission to a Metro Vancouver consultation on the more...

Quebec Auditor General slams Montreal P3 project

Jun 15, 2010

Report finds public option $10.4 million less expensive BURNABY—A recent report by the auditor general of Quebec warning decision-makers to avoid a public-private more...

CRD vulnerable to trade restrictions with sewage P3

Mar 09, 2010

BURNABY—If local governments opt for public private partnerships (P3s), something which is under consideration for the Capital Regional District’s more...

Click here for the archive

 

Keep It Public

keep it public

The private sector does a lot of things well. What it doesn’t do well is finance and deliver public services.

There are consequences when we hand management of water and sewage systems, roads and bridges, and hospital services and recreation facilities over to private, for-profit companies.

We lose control over those resources, we sacrifice transparency and often wind up paying much more. 

If you're concerned about contracting out in your workplace, we can help you understand how privatization works and how to fight it.

You can also contact the Anti-Privatization Coordinator to help Keep it Public!

Here are some resources that can help you in your fight against privatization.

Latest Story

September 3, 2010

CUPE 50 raises contracting-out concerns

VICTORIA—CUPE 50 president John Burrows called on Victoria’s Mayor and Council to fully consider the public option in solid waste collection and management. In an address to Council yesterday, Burrows noted that not only will privatization of Victoria’s solid waste cost jobs, it will cost residents in terms of quality of service delivery, loss of accountability, and higher costs. Burrows pointed out that flexibility to change or add to the program without additional charges is a benefit of ...

Read More